IN THIS LESSON
In a city plagued with people who are careless with the truth, by the simple act of questioning those who claim to know, Socrates becomes a legend.
Topics discussed:
The philosophical notion of bullshit
The Socratic elenchus
Socrates’ ethics
Xenophon on self-mastery
For lesson transcripts, go to zencastr.com/The-Luxury-of-Virtue.

Focus Questions
Given what we learn from the accounts of Plato and Xenophon, what were the primary reasons that Socrates sought to use the elenchus to inquire about the beliefs of those in Athens?
What is the philosophical notion of bullshit? Can you think of examples of bullshitters in your life?
What is akrasia? What is moral intellectualism? Why is Socrates’ belief in moral intellectualism result in his denying the possibility of akrasia?
According to Socrates, the philosophical life is good both for the individual and for society. How is living philosophically good for the individual, according to Socrates? How is living philosophically good for society?
What is freedom, according to Socrates?
Xenophon stresses the need for self-control, which he believes has three facets: self-mastery, endurance, and self-sufficiency. Define these three aspects of self-control. How can you improve on each of these in your life?
Xenophon conceives of self-control as an ability, one that we have to work to gain and maintain. Why does Xenophon think that self-control is so fundamental?

Glossary
Socratic Philosophy & Methods
Socratic Elenchus (ἔλεγχος) – Also known as Socratic questioning, this is the method of dialectical inquiry in which Socrates leads his interlocutors to discover inconsistencies in their beliefs.
Goal: Not just to win arguments but to purge false beliefs and refine one’s understanding.
Example: Socrates asks Euthyphro for a definition of piety; when each definition leads to contradiction, Euthyphro is forced to admit he doesn’t truly know what piety is.
Why It Matters: This method trains the mind in critical thinking and ensures that one’s beliefs are well-grounded in reason rather than convention or personal bias.
Moral Intellectualism – The Socratic view that virtue is knowledge, meaning that no one does evil willingly.
Implication: All wrongdoing stems from ignorance—if a person knew what was truly good, they would pursue it.
Contrast with Akrasia: Unlike Aristotle, Socrates denies that people knowingly act against their better judgment.
Akrasia (ἀκρασία) – The condition of acting against one’s own best judgment, often due to lack of self-control.
Socrates' View: Akrasia is impossible because all actions follow from one’s actual beliefs—if someone acts wrongly, it’s because they mistakenly believed that action was best.
Contrast: Aristotle disagreed, arguing that people can act against their own reasoned decisions due to emotional impulses.
Freedom as Self-Mastery – Socrates’ idea that true freedom is not doing whatever you want, but rather governing yourself rationally.
Contrast with Modern Freedom: Today, freedom is often seen as lack of external constraint, but for Socrates, it is inner self-governance—freedom from passions, impulses, and ignorance.
Why It Matters: Only those who have mastered themselves can engage in meaningful dialogue, make wise choices, and live virtuously.
Xenophon’s Ethical Views
Virtue as a Direction, Not a Destination –
Unlike Plato, Xenophon believed that virtue is like physical fitness—it requires continuous effort to maintain.
Implication: Even a virtuous person can lose their way if they do not practice self-discipline.
Contrast with Plato: Plato believed that once a person attains true moral knowledge, they will never lose it. Xenophon disagrees, arguing that people can fall back into bad habits.
Enkrateia (ἐγκράτεια) – Self-Mastery –
The ability to control one’s desires and impulses to pursue long-term excellence.
Includes:
Resisting unnecessary pleasure-seeking.
Withstanding pain and hardship without complaint.
Keeping one’s values straight—not letting desires dictate what one sees as "good."
Examples:
Socrates attending a feast without overindulging.
A general resisting comfort to lead his army well.
Modern equivalent: Not needing social media validation to feel good about yourself.
Karteria (καρτερία) – Endurance – The ability to withstand physical pain, exhaustion, or hardship without breaking.
Xenophon’s Example: Good leaders endure hunger, cold, and fatigue just as soldiers must.
Modern Parallels: Long-distance runners, endurance athletes, Navy SEAL training, Stoic resilience.
Autarkeia (αὐτάρκεια) – Self-Sufficiency – The ability to thrive on little and not be dependent on external luxuries.
Practical Benefits:
Allows a leader to function in difficult conditions.
Makes a person resilient in changing circumstances.
Contrast with Hedonism: While hedonists pursue maximum pleasure, Xenophon argues that dependence on comfort makes a person weak.
Virtue & Leadership
Leadership as Ethical Mastery – Xenophon saw self-mastery as the key to effective leadership.
A good leader must:
Control their own desires before controlling others.
Remain calm under pressure.
Show discipline in personal life so others will follow.
Example: A general who drinks in moderation, resists corruption, and remains composed in battle will inspire respect.
Philanthropia (φιλανθρωπία) – Generosity & Concern for Others –
True friendship and leadership require a deep concern for the well-being of others.
Example:
Socrates’ friendships were built on a desire to help others improve.
Cyrus the Great’s leadership was based on his commitment to his followers.
Modern Parallel: The best leaders today are often those who mentor others rather than simply command them.
The Highest Pleasure = Self-Improvement –
Unlike Aristippus (who claimed pleasure is the highest good), Xenophon argued that the greatest joy is awareness of one’s own self-improvement.
"Going to that party, buying that gizmo, casual sex—how does that help you in the long run?"
Key Takeaway: Short-term pleasures fade, but personal development lasts.
Friendship & Community Ethics
Virtuous Friendship –
True friendship is based on mutual self-improvement.
Implication: Those who lead us into bad habits or distractions are not true friends.
Analogy of the Field: Just as a farmer cares for his field, a person must carefully choose the friends who help them grow.
Dialogue & Rational Persuasion –
Disagreement should be resolved through calm, rational dialogue rather than emotional outbursts.
Xenophon’s Example: Socrates criticizes pederasty tactfully and with grace rather than aggressively condemning it.
Modern Parallel: Today’s political and social discourse is often dominated by emotional reactions rather than rational debate.
Xenophon vs. Plato on Socrates
Plato's Socrates
Focuses on abstract definitions (e.g., "What is justice?")
Sometimes appears arrogant or dismissive
A rationalist who pursues pure truth
Believes virtue is knowledge and once attained, it is never lost
Xenophon's Socrates
Focuses on practical ethics and leadership
Emphasizes self-discipline and humility
A pragmatist who values wisdom for practical life
Believes virtue is like physical fitness—it must be maintained through effort
Words You Might Not Know
Elenchus (ἔλεγχος) – Socratic questioning designed to expose contradictions.
Enkrateia (ἐγκράτεια) – Self-mastery; control over one’s desires.
Karteria (καρτερία) – Endurance; the ability to withstand hardship.
Autarkeia (αὐτάρκεια) – Self-sufficiency; not being dependent on luxuries.
Philanthropia (φιλανθρωπία) – Generosity; concern for the well-being of others.
Hedonism (Ἡδονή) – The belief that pleasure is the highest good.
The Socratic Problem – The difficulty of determining Socrates’ true beliefs, since different sources (Plato, Xenophon, Aristophanes) present him differently.
For other questions…

Reading List
David Conan Wolfdorf, Early Greek Ethics.
C. C. W. Taylor, Socrates: A very short introduction
Donald Kagan, The Peloponnesian War
Other Relevant Material
Harry Frankfurt, On Bullshit